2008 Events
Seminars
Giving Teeth to International Human Rights Treaties: Commissions, Courts and Corporations - A Practitioner's Perspective.
Professor Brian Burdekin, Visiting Professor at the Raoul
Wallenberg Institute,
17 July 2008
Thinking about "constitutional dictatorship".
Professor Sanford Levinson, The
4 August 2008
The party and the judges: Threats to the independence of the
judiciary in
Professor Christina Murray,
13 August 2008
Codification system in the Anglo-American Legal Tradition:
The case of
Professor Aniceto Masferrer, Professor of Comparative Legal History in the Faculty of Law,
August/September/October TBC
27 August 2008
The Evolution of a Revolution: The
Professor Li-ann Thio, Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore
24 September 2008
Bicameralism and the British House of Lords.
Dr Meg Russell, Reader in British and Comparative Politics,
Constitution Unit, Department of Political Science, University
College,
21 October 2008
Political responsibility for rights protection in
Dr
28 October 2008
Disintegration through Law? - On the Decomposition of Citizenship in
Professor Dr Alexander Graser, Professor of Comparative
Public Law and Social Policy,
17 November 2008
The Office of Lord Chancellor, the Judiciary and the Constitutional Reform Act 2005: '... a new and original plan'?
Professor Peter Leyland, Professor of Public Law,
24 November 2008
PhD Confirmation Seminar:
Ms Hajrah Saboor, PhD candidate, Melbourne Law School
3 December 2008
Real Constitutional Dialogue: From
Assistant Professor Rosalind Dixon,
16 December 2008
Public Lectures
Inaugural Professorial Lecture
Foreign Law and Constitutional Interpretation: Cautious Comparativism or Judicial Activism?
Professor Adrienne Stone, Director of the Centre for Comparative Constitutional Studies,
26 November 2008
Judges throughout the world routinely refer to the judgements of courts in other countries for guidance however the practice remains sharply contested. Some judges and scholars go so far as to claim that reference to foreign law amounts to an unethical activism. In her inaugural Professorial lecture, Professor Stone defended the practice against claims of judicial activism and considered the following questions:
§ Is it legitimate to refer to foreign law in interpreting the Australian Constitution?
§ Is foreign law relevant to the Australian Constitution?
§ How should judges use foreign law in constitution cases?
Professor
Conference
2008 Protecting Human Rights Conference
3 October 2008